Peer Reviews

After going to studio with my rationale I had it marked by two of my peers. They both gave good critique which made editing my final rationale easier. 

The first of my peer reviews marked:

1. Knowledge and Understanding = 4

2. Research = 4

3. Independent Thought = 4

4. Logical Development = 4

5. Presentation = 3

Structure of it very good. You have included lots of very strong points. Perhaps the conclusion could be different, felt it got a little lost. I liked your experiment. You were able to provide good evidence throughout to support your points. 

The second of my peer reviews marked:

1. Knowledge and Understanding = 4

2. Research = 5

3. Independent Thought = 4

4. Logical Development = 4

5. Presentation = na

Good justification of research. Re-writing your introduction would help, also a conclusion would be nice. Also, maybe breaking up your description of your experiment into what you did and aimed for and your results. 

After reading their feedback I need to write a coherent introduction and conclusion which accurately explains what i did and why.